Cut and fill estimating measures the soil moved between existing grade and proposed subgrade, priced in bank, loose, and compacted cubic yards. You need it when a sitework bid hinges on whether dirt balances on-site or requires haul-off or borrow import, and when the geotech report flags unsuitable material under the building pad or footings. We take off the grading plan by grid or average-end-area cross-section, apply shrink and swell factors, and separate cut, fill, undercut, borrow, and disposal into priced lines organized by CSI MasterFormat Division 31 — 31 23 00 for excavation and fill, 31 22 00 for grading, and 31 11 00 for clearing — with 33 00 00 utilities carried as a separate division so trench spoils do not distort the balance. Every line carries a sheet reference, a unit basis, and the assumption used, so your reviewer can trace the quantity back to the drawing.
- Deliverable
- Excel estimate + marked-up PDF plans
- Organized by
- CSI MasterFormat section
- Turnaround
- 24–48 hours for most projects
- Pricing
- ZIP-code-adjusted material and labor pricing
- Software
- Bluebeam Revu, PlanSwift, RSMeans data
The takeoff feeds directly into our Excavation & Earthwork Estimating scope and coordinates with Surface Grading Estimating for finish elevations and Site Utilities Estimating for trench spoils. Where the site plan shows a detention pond, retaining wall, or riprap outfall, those quantities are separated so they do not distort the mass haul balance. If the project spans multiple states, we adjust material and labor pricing by ZIP code and reference the adopted code edition you confirm with the local building department. Turnaround is 24–48 hours for most projects, with rush available. We deliver an Excel workbook and PDF with the marked-up plan set, so your bid review does not require re-measuring the grading plan.
As a cut and fill estimating company, we build the model in Trimble Business Center or Agtek from the same surface data you would use, then check it against an on-screen takeoff in Bluebeam Revu or PlanSwift. We read the geotech report for Proctor density, moisture content, and bearing capacity before we set shrink and swell, and we flag slope stability or geotextile notes that change the undercut depth. For a cut and fill estimate for contractors bidding hard, the mass haul, borrow import, and surplus export are priced separately so you can see which line moves your number. Our sitework estimating services also cover asphalt paving, concrete curb, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water main quantities that share the same dirt. Send the grading plan, geotech, and any grading permit comments through Get an estimate and we return a preconstruction-ready scope of work you can drop into a request for proposal.
What our cut and fill estimating company covers
We measure earthwork from the civil grading plan, stripping limits, and geotech boring logs. Volumes are computed by grid or average-end-area cross-section, then converted to bank, loose, and compacted CY with shrink and swell factors stated on the summary sheet. Every line is tied to a sheet reference and a CSI section so your bid review does not require re-measuring.
Clearing & Grubbing
Measure and price removal of vegetation, trees, and obstructions within the limits of disturbance.
SF · ACTopsoil Strip
Calculate volume of topsoil to strip at specified depth and stockpile or haul off.
CYCut Volume
Determine bank cubic yards of soil excavated from existing grade to proposed subgrade.
BCYFill Volume
Compute compacted cubic yards of fill required from subgrade to finish grade.
CCYUndercut & Backfill
Quantify unsuitable material removal and backfill per geotechnical recommendations.
CYBorrow Import
Estimate quantity of borrow material needed with haul distance and source assumptions.
CYSurplus Export
Calculate excess soil to be exported and disposed of, priced by volume or weight.
CY · TONTrench Backfill
Measure trench excavation and backfill for site utilities, including compaction.
LF · CYWhat every cut & fill estimating takeoff includes
- Site clearing and grubbing by SF or acre from the limits of disturbance
- Topsoil strip at 4–8 in. depth, stockpile or haul-off by CY
- Cut volume from existing grade to proposed subgrade, bank CY
- Fill volume from subgrade to finish grade, compacted CY
- Unsuitable material undercut and backfill per geotech recommendation
- Borrow import quantity with haul distance and source assumption
- Surplus soil export and disposal by CY or ton
- Shrink and swell factors applied to bank versus compacted volumes
- Structural fill placement and compaction lifts, 8–12 in. loose
- Trench excavation and backfill for site utilities, CY or LF
- Erosion control: silt fence, inlet protection, stabilized entrance
- Dewatering and pumping allowance based on groundwater notes
How our cut and fill estimator takes off volumes
- Import and orient plansWe load the civil grading plan, boundary survey, and geotech report into Bluebeam Revu and PlanSwift. Existing and proposed spot elevations are digitized to a common datum, and the limits of disturbance are traced to set the stripping boundary. Sheet references are logged so every quantity can be traced back to a drawing.
- Strip and clearClearing and grubbing are measured by SF or acre inside the limits of disturbance. Topsoil strip depth is taken from the geotech report or the erosion control notes, typically 4–8 in., and converted to CY. We flag whether the stripped material is stockpiled on-site or hauled off, because the two price differently.
- Compute cut and fill volumesWe build a grid or average-end-area cross-section model between existing grade and proposed subgrade. Cut is reported in bank CY; fill is reported in compacted CY. Structural fill under footings and slabs is separated from general fill so the compaction spec and lift thickness can be priced correctly.
- Apply shrink and swellBank, loose, and compacted volumes are converted with shrink and swell factors stated on the summary. A typical factor is applied to the cut volume to estimate compacted fill available on-site, and the difference drives the borrow or export line. We show the factor on the face of the estimate so your reviewer can adjust it.
- Balance and price haulWe compare total cut against total fill plus undercut backfill to determine net import or export. Borrow is priced with a haul distance assumption and a source location; export is priced by CY or ton with disposal fees. Trench spoils from site utilities are added to the export side when they cannot be reused.
- Assemble by CSI divisionQuantities are organized under Division 31 sections, with erosion control under 31 25 00 and soil treatment under 31 31 00. Each line carries a sheet reference, a unit basis, and a note on the assumption used. The workbook and PDF are returned with the marked-up plan set.
What we need from you
- Civil grading planExisting and proposed spot elevations, limits of disturbance, and finish grade contours.
- Geotech reportBoring logs, unsuitable material depth, groundwater elevation, and compaction requirements.
- Boundary surveyProperty lines, easements, and benchmark datum to tie spot elevations to a common reference.
- Erosion control planSilt fence runs, inlet protection locations, and stabilized construction entrance detail.
- Utility planTrench depths and alignments so spoils and backfill can be added to the earthwork balance.
- SpecificationsDivision 31 sections for fill material, lift thickness, and compaction testing frequency.
- Bid formYour line item structure so our quantities drop into your bid without reformatting.
Sample cut and fill estimate format
This is the format we return. Quantities are illustrative and tied to sheet references so your reviewer can trace each line.
| Section | Line item | Qty | Unit | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 10 00 | Clearing and grubbing within limits of disturbance | 1.8 | AC | C-101 |
| 31 10 00 | Topsoil strip 6 in. deep, stockpile on-site | 18,400 | SF | C-101 |
| 31 23 16 | Cut to subgrade, bank CY, on-site suitable | 4,200 | CY | C-201 |
| 31 23 00 | Fill to finish grade, compacted CY, 95% Standard Proctor | 3,850 | CY | C-201 |
| 31 23 16 | Undercut unsuitable material 3 ft and backfill with structural fill | 9,800 | SF | C-301 |
| 31 23 00 | Import borrow, 8-mile haul, compacted CY | 1,150 | CY | C-401 |
| 31 25 00 | Silt fence, Type A, along downslope perimeter | 1,240 | LF | C-501 |
| 31 25 00 | Stabilized construction entrance with aggregate | 1 | EA | C-501 |
| 31 23 16 | Export surplus soil, 12-mile haul, disposal fee included | 850 | CY | C-401 |
| 31 31 00 | Soil treatment for termite control under slab areas | 6,200 | SF | C-601 |
Units of measure in earthwork quantity takeoff
Earthwork quantities change meaning with the unit basis. We label every line with its unit and state whether it is bank, loose, or compacted.
| Item | Unit | How it's measured |
|---|---|---|
| Cubic yards (CY) | CY | Volume of cut, fill, undercut, or borrow; basis stated as bank, loose, or compacted |
| Square feet (SF) | SF | Clearing, stripping, and surface area measured from the limits of disturbance |
| Square yards (SY) | SY | Erosion control blankets and paving areas measured by plan dimension |
| Linear feet (LF) | LF | Trenching, swales, and silt fence measured along the centerline |
| Tons | TON | Imported borrow and disposal by weight where the scale ticket governs payment |
| Each (EA) | EA | Inlet protection, tree removal, and test pits counted from the plan |
| Acre (AC) | AC | Clearing and grubbing for large sites, converted from square feet at 43,560 SF per acre |
Cut and fill estimate for a small commercial pad — illustrative
This example walks through a cut and fill takeoff for a 200 ft × 150 ft building pad on a gently sloping site. All dimensions and elevations are illustrative; your project will have its own survey and geotech data. We use the grid method because the site has regular contours.
Step 1 — Set the grid and read elevations. We divide the pad into a 50 ft × 50 ft grid (4 columns × 3 rows = 12 cells). From the grading plan, we record existing and proposed spot elevations at each grid intersection. For this example, the average existing elevation is 102.5 ft and the proposed subgrade is 100.0 ft, giving an average cut depth of 2.5 ft across the pad.
Step 2 — Compute cut volume. Pad area = 200 ft × 150 ft = 30,000 SF. Average cut depth = 2.5 ft. Cut volume = 30,000 SF × 2.5 ft = 75,000 CF. Convert to bank cubic yards: 75,000 CF ÷ 27 = 2,778 BCY.
Step 3 — Compute fill volume. The proposed finish grade is 101.0 ft, so fill depth above subgrade = 1.0 ft. Fill volume = 30,000 SF × 1.0 ft = 30,000 CF. Convert to compacted cubic yards: 30,000 CF ÷ 27 = 1,111 CCY.
Step 4 — Apply shrink/swell. We assume a typical 15% shrink factor for the on-site soil (bank to compacted). Available compacted fill from cut = 2,778 BCY × 0.85 = 2,361 CCY. Net fill required = 1,111 CCY − 2,361 CCY = −1,250 CCY (surplus). So the site has 1,250 CCY of surplus soil to export.
Step 5 — Add stripping and undercut. Topsoil strip: 6 in. over 30,000 SF = 15,000 CF = 556 CY (stockpiled on-site). Undercut: geotech recommends 2 ft under footings over a 5,000 SF area. Undercut volume = 5,000 SF × 2 ft = 10,000 CF = 370 CY. Backfill with structural fill: 370 CY compacted.
Step 6 — Adjust balance. Total cut available = 2,778 BCY (minus topsoil 556 CY, which is not suitable for structural fill). Usable cut = 2,778 − 556 = 2,222 BCY. Compacted equivalent = 2,222 × 0.85 = 1,889 CCY. Total fill required = 1,111 CCY (pad) + 370 CCY (undercut backfill) = 1,481 CCY. Surplus = 1,889 − 1,481 = 408 CCY export (plus topsoil 556 CY). Total export = 408 + 556 = 964 CY.
Step 7 — Price haul and disposal. Export 964 CY at an assumed 12-mile haul and $18/CY disposal fee. We show the haul distance and fee as assumptions.
This is the level of detail we return for every cut and fill takeoff. We show the grid, the shrink factor, and the balance on the face of the estimate so you can adjust any input before bid.
What drives cut and fill cost estimating
Relative impact on a typical estimate for this trade, based on estimator judgment. Select a bar for details.
Balance
A site that balances cut and fill avoids both borrow import and export disposal, which are the two largest swing items. A 5,000 CY imbalance can move the earthwork number by six figures depending on haul distance and disposal fees. We report the balance explicitly so you can negotiate grade changes before bid. We also show the cut and fill volumes by grid area so you can see where the imbalance sits.
A site that balances cut and fill avoids both borrow import and export disposal, which are the two largest swing items. A 5,000 CY imbalance can move the earthwork number by six figures depending on haul distance and disposal fees. We report the balance explicitly so you can negotiate grade changes before bid. We also show the cut and fill volumes by grid area so you can see where the imbalance sits.
Borrow and disposal unit prices are driven by round-trip haul time, truck count, and road restrictions. A 5-mile haul and a 25-mile haul price differently even when the volume is identical. We state the assumed haul distance on the face of the estimate. We also note whether the route crosses weight-restricted bridges or requires permits, because those add cost per load.
Undercut depth from the geotech report governs how much material is excavated, disposed of, and replaced with structural fill. When the report gives a range, we price the deep case as an allowance and flag it for confirmation during construction. We also separate undercut below footings from undercut below slabs, because the backfill spec and compaction differ.
Bank volume expands when excavated and shrinks when compacted. Using the wrong factor changes the import quantity and the truck count. We show the factor applied to each cut and fill line so your reviewer can test it against the geotech. We also state whether the factor is based on a lab proctor or a typical range, and flag it if the report does not provide one.
Rock excavation is priced by CY or ton with different equipment and disposal. If the geotech classifies rippable rock, we separate it from soil cut. If it does not, we carry a rock allowance and note the assumption. We also check the boring logs for weathered shale or caliche layers that may require ripping or blasting.
Groundwater elevation above the excavation subgrade requires pumps, wellpoints, or a dewatering allowance. The geotech report and the utility trench depths tell us where the water table sits relative to the cut. We price a pumping allowance when the water table is within 2 ft of the subgrade. We also note if the dewatering discharge requires a permit or settling basin.
Higher compaction percentages (e.g., 95% vs. 90% Standard Proctor) require more passes, thinner lifts, and more testing, increasing labor and equipment time. We price the specified compaction and note the lift thickness assumed from the geotech or spec. We also separate structural fill under footings from general fill, because the testing frequency and lift thickness often differ.
Common scope gaps in cut and fill bid estimating
These are the items that most often turn up after award. We look for them in the grading plan, geotech report, and specifications before the bid goes out.
- Shrink and swell factors are omitted and the estimate is priced in bank CY while the contract pays compacted CY. We catch it by reconciling the cut volume against the fill volume and stating the factor on the summary.
- Undercut depth is buried in a geotech recommendation rather than shown on the grading plan. We read the boring logs against the footing subgrade and carry the undercut as a separate line.
- Topsoil strip is assumed to be stockpiled on-site when the site has no room. We check the layout for stockpile area and price haul-off if the plan does not show one.
- Erosion control items are on the SWPPP sheet but missing from the bid form. We measure silt fence, inlet protection, and stabilized entrance from the plan and add them under 31 25 00.
- Trench spoils from site utilities are not added to the export side of the balance. We coordinate with the utility takeoff so spoils are counted once, not twice.
- Compaction testing and proofrolling are left to the general conditions. We list the frequency from the spec and flag it so it is either priced or explicitly excluded.
- Rock excavation is not separated from soil cut. We check the geotech for rippability and carry a separate rock line if the report indicates hardpan or bedrock within the cut depth.
- Dewatering is omitted when the groundwater table is above the excavation subgrade. We compare the geotech groundwater elevation to the proposed subgrade and add a pumping or wellpoint allowance if needed.
- Disposal fees for unsuitable material are not included. We price haul-off and tipping fees based on the undercut volume and the assumed disposal site location.
Fill types and unit cost drivers
Not all fill is priced the same. The table compares common fill types by unit cost, shrink/swell behavior, and compaction requirements. Unit costs are illustrative and vary by region and haul distance.
| Fill type | Typical unit cost (per CY) | Shrink/swell factor | Compaction requirement | Haul distance sensitivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On-site suitable cut | $0 (already owned) | 15–25% shrink (bank to compacted) | 95% Standard Proctor | None if used on-site; export cost if surplus |
| Imported borrow (bank run) | $12–$25 | 10–20% shrink | 95% Standard Proctor | High — haul distance drives cost |
| Engineered fill (imported) | $25–$40 | 5–10% shrink | 98% Standard Proctor | High — may require specific source |
| Aggregate base (crushed stone) | $30–$50 | 0% shrink (already compacted) | 100% Modified Proctor | Medium — local quarry availability |
| Cement-stabilized soil | $15–$30 | 0% shrink | Per mix design | Low — mixed on-site |
| Flowable fill (CLSM) | $80–$120 | 0% shrink | Self-compacting | Low — delivered by truck |
Codes and standards that affect cut and fill quantities
Model codes
Cut and fill work is governed primarily by the International Building Code (IBC) and International Residential Code (IRC) for structural fill and grading, and by the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for insulation and drainage details that may affect backfill. The IBC addresses site grading, excavation, and fill placement in Chapter 18 (Soils and Foundations) and Chapter 33 (Safeguards During Construction). These provisions set minimum compaction and testing requirements that change the number of lifts, testing frequency, and equipment time. The adopted edition varies by state and municipality; confirm the edition your local building department enforces, because older editions may have different compaction thresholds.
Industry standards
ASTM D698 (Standard Proctor) and ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor) define the laboratory compaction curves that establish the percentage compaction specified. ASTM D6938 (nuclear gauge) and ASTM D6938 (sand cone) are the field test methods that dictate testing frequency. ACI 318 and ACI 332 cover concrete foundation requirements that may influence undercut and backfill. For erosion control, the EPA's NPDES permit and state SWPPP requirements drive silt fence, inlet protection, and stabilized entrance quantities. These standards directly affect the number of compaction tests, lift thickness, and erosion control items in the takeoff.
Specification sections
You must read Division 31 sections in the project manual. Key sections: 31 10 00 Site Clearing (clearing limits and topsoil strip depth), 31 20 00 Earth Moving (cut and fill methods), 31 22 00 Grading (finish grade tolerances), 31 23 00 Excavation and Fill (fill material specs, lift thickness, compaction), 31 23 16 Excavation (undercut and backfill), 31 23 19 Trenching and Backfilling (utility spoils), 31 25 00 Erosion and Sedimentation Controls (silt fence, inlet protection), 31 31 00 Soil Treatment (termite control), and 31 32 00 Soil Stabilization (cement or lime treatment). What changes cost: fill material gradation, lift thickness (8 in. vs. 12 in.), compaction percentage, and testing frequency.
Local amendments
Adopted code editions and local amendments vary widely. Some jurisdictions require a geotechnical report for all cut and fill over a certain volume, while others mandate specific erosion control measures during the rainy season. Local amendments may also dictate disposal site requirements or borrow source permits. Because these requirements change quantities and unit prices, you must confirm the adopted code edition and any local amendments with the local building department before finalizing your bid. We adjust our takeoff to the code edition you specify, but we do not assume one.
Who uses this outsourced cut and fill estimating
General contractors
You need a defensible earthwork number to compare against subcontractor bids and to negotiate a grade change before award. The balance analysis shows where a small design change removes a large import or export line.
Sitework subcontractors
You bid cut and fill against a short window and need quantities you can trust without re-measuring the whole grading plan. The line items map to your bid form and the assumptions are stated so you can adjust them.
Developers
You use the balance and haul analysis to test site feasibility and to compare land parcels. A site that imports 10,000 CY prices very differently from one that balances.
Architects and engineers
You use the takeoff to check that the grading plan matches the geotech recommendations and to size allowances before the design is frozen. The marked-up plan set shows exactly what was measured.
Owners
You use the estimate to validate the sitework line in a guaranteed maximum price or a construction loan budget. The unit basis and shrink/swell factor are shown so your reviewer can audit the number.